On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Alejandro Imass <[email protected]> wrote: > I wish someone could clearly explain why the reply-to field should > ONLY have the mailing-list address, or at least have as the default > address and not the other way around as it is here!
This is one of the all-time great religious wars of the internet, on par with vi vs. Emacs and top-posting vs. bottom-posting. See http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html for one side of the argument, and http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html for the other side. My advice is to just accept that some mailing list administrators will choose one side of this particular schism, and others will choose the other. Arguing the issue rarely gets anywhere. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
