On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 08:50:53PM -0400, David Scheidt wrote:
On Apr 24, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Lionel Fourquaux wrote:
em0 has addresses fe80::1234:56ff:fe78:9abc and 2001:db8::1
em1 has address fe80::1234:56ff:fe78:9abd
Network 2001:db8::/64 is directly attached to em0, and network
2001:db8:0:1::/64 is directly attached to em1. The default route points to em0.
I would like to route packets addressed to 2001:db8:0:1::/64 to interface em1,
without allocating an address in 2001:db8:0:1::/64 for em1. (Or to understand
why this would be impossible).
Why do you want to do this?
Because I think it would look better that way.
How do you expect the hosts on the attached networks to get packets to you?
They are already using fe80::1234:56ff:fe78:9abd as default gateway, so
this is not a problem.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
