On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob Farmer <rfarmer <at> predatorlabs.net> writes: > >> Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently? > > tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line > interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is offered > at that, but… >
(New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive tcsh, so it is a good idea to be compatible when posting stuff to the mailing lists, etc. if possible. There was something on the ports@ list a while back, about PRs for new ports, where this came up. > http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/ > I've read it before. Who hasn't? And I find it unconvincing, since it is just a list of shortcomings. If those shortcomings don't affect me, why do I care? -- Rob Farmer _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
