On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
<freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
<snip>
Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I
thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting
feelers out, though :)
Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a 939?
Sorry you're not having much luck.
If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable,
but that's better left to someone more local for you!
Hope you get some results soon.
Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have
been a local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then
Semperon's were 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were
AM2, but that was just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I
believe. But again, that may have been local.
I've got wholesale contacts, but I was hoping to make use of this spare
chip and RAM floating about. Diff would be around $100, so only kinda
worth it.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
