> It is faster/easier to fix NDISulator than to port ndiswrapper to FreeBSD.
>
No doubt it would be faster and easier to fix NDISulator then to port
ndiswrapper. This at least answers my question as to weather ndiswrapper
actually works/exists in FreeBSD64. So am I basically screwed here for
wireless till it is fixed (I'm no programmer so it's out of my field of
expertise)
Did you know...
If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages,
but what's worse is when you play it forward....
...it installs Windows 2000
-- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org
<http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
