On 1 October 2010 15:34, Kevin Wilcox <kevin.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 October 2010 10:16, Daniel Bye > <freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:40:56AM -0400, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > > >> Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built > >> into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is > >> there something in 'audit' that is lacking? > > > I think krad is referring to the well-publicised code audit that the > OpenBSD > > project conducts, rather than the TrustedBSD audit framework. As far as I > > know, OpenBSD doesn't have anything comparable, but it's a long time > since I > > looked at it, so I might be typing out of me ear... > > Dan, that makes perfect sense. I'm working up a BSD presentation for > the local LUG next week and the latest compare/contrast I was working > on was SELinux/GrSecurity/Pax versus TrustedBSD; my brain immediately > parsed auditing as an audit trail, not the immense code audit for the > base system. > > Thanks for the reality check!! > > kmw > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > I know what you mean, whenever i have worked with SELINUX policies and the bsd MAC framework, it has fried my brain a little 8) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
