Thank you for your support. You're right, our administrator has to add a route back to the new gateway.
Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2010, 21:30:08 schrieb Beat Siegenthaler: > > On 15.09.10 21:10, Wolfgang Riegler wrote: > > > > I thought gateway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf should be sufficient. But > > > it doesn't work. Do I need something else? > > > > > > > Looks all ok. > But does 192.168.40.1 have a route to 192.168.50.0/24 via GW > 192.168.40.122? > > > > Internet: > > > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > > > default 192.168.40.1 UGS 0 0 rl0 > > > 127.0.0.1 link#6 UH 0 0 lo0 > > > 192.168.40.0/24 link#2 U 1 274 rl0 > > > 192.168.40.122 link#2 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > > 192.168.50.0/24 link#1 U 0 15 re0 > > > 192.168.50.1 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > > > Gruss Beat > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
