On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Jens Rehsack writes:
[...]
I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous.
dangerous ? why ?
Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source.
getpwent(3) delivers entries from yp, too (or LDAP) etc. - and
when I call setpwent(3) for such an entry, what happens then?
Long explanation for: I do not know the consequences - and that's
why I rate it dangerous as workaround.
Jens
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
