Martin Cracauer wrote: > Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL > binaries, BTW.
There are "recent" cmucl binaries built here: http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/ for freebsd 7 and freebsd 8. I think this is for x86, not x86-64 but they should work, it is not clear for me if cmucl makes use of 64 bits anyways (maxima doesn't). Unfortunately there are not more recent snapshots for freebsd 8 and no freebsd snapshots at all since 2010. In january 2010 there is the comment: " The FreeBSD binaries I had uploaded for the snapshot were flawed: I just discovered that I accidentally built them without Unicode support. To avoid confusion, these binaries have been removed. -- Alex Goncharov, 2010-03-30 " Being a maxima user i am very attached to cmucl which works very well with maxima (faster than sbcl), and i have in the past compiled cmucl using older cmucl versions, which works quite easily. Here i am afraid that Alex Goncharov has encountered some problem, and also that Darwin, Linux and NetBSD support were considered more important ... -- Michel TALON _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
