>You might be able to reduce the iso size some by making a tarball of /var >(using tar -y or tar -z) instead of keeping /var2 as a tree. >Granted you would then need to have tar(1) in the iso, which may cancel out >much of the savings if you would not otherwise have needed it.
Actually, /var is tiny compared to everything else we have in the image so converting it to a tarball wouldn't really have any impact... _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
