On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 > Alberto Mijares <[email protected]> articulated: > >> As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by >> default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some >> limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of >> FreeBSD. >> >> I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if I >> don't need exotic features. > > Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? > > -- > Jerry
Hi Jerry, You can achieve some kind of dynamic rules by using "lookup tables" or the pipe(8) daemon in Postfix. However, Sendmail has many more predefined macros, which can be used in rule sets for handle dynamic routing, headers-rewrites, queues, milters, MDA's, etc, for example. That's what I meant when said "limitations and exotic features". Not saying that Postfix is "bate quebrado" ;-) Without being a fan, I rise the flag for Postfix; I just know the power of Sendmail too. Best regards Alberto Mijares _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
