2009/12/21 Yuri <y...@rawbw.com>: > ill...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Umm . . . yes? But more seriously, FreeBSD is still >> very much a server operating system, expecting it to >> be exactly like Torvalds 2.6 OS or BiGa 0.7alpha right >> now is a bit much. >> > > Really? I was using FreeBSD as a desktop system for at least 10 years and it > works quite well as a desktop. There are few defects, like the lack of > network manager. > If it was very much a server operating system, what are kde and gnome teams > doing in your opinion? They seem to be completely unaware of that either. >
Nonexclusive properties. Statements tending to create a false dichotomy. Nevermind. -- -- _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
