On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:00:53 +0200 Polytropon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:28:08 -0700 (PDT), Richard Mahlerwein > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree completely. I also go a step farther and put most other > > things that I consider user data in there. Like Subversion > > repositories and non-user-specific Samba shares (E.g. "public" > > type shares). > > Historically, there was /export in Solaris. The home directory > was /export/home, because it was usually distributed via NFS to > other machines. Things that were shared, but not primarily under- > stood as "user data", went there, too, such as repositories, > file collections and exported storages - files that have not > been "connected" to a specific user. > > > > > While I'm reasonably happy rolling my own FS sizes, I would be > > even happier if I didn't have to. > > In ZFS, you don't have to. :-) > > > > According to your suggestion: > > > Drive > 16 and < 40 GB = > > / = 1 GB > > swap = 1.5x RAM > > I know that there was the idea of saying "swap = 2 x the maximum > of RAM you could put into the box", but is this approach still > valid today? Having just built a desktop PC which can fit 24GB RAM (but has 6GB installed currently), I don't think having 48GB swap really makes any sense. With minidumps you don't even need swap=1x RAM any more, so I've started allocating up to 4GB swap in my machines, which should still provide enough warning of a runaway process. -- Bruce _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
