On Oct 10, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:53:35 -0400
Lowell Gilbert (freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org) replied:
Unfortunately, it's under an unacceptable license.

I was not aware of that. What is the problem?

Somewhere around binutils-2.17, it switched to using GPLv3.

Perhaps, if it is not all
ready available, the FreeBSD developers can devise some directive to
place in the '/etc/make.conf' file that would force the use of the
'port' version instead if it was available in a fashion similar to what
is done with OpenSSL; i.e. "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes". Perhaps,
"WITH_BINUTILS_PORT=yes".

That's not a bad idea, although you can likely export PREFIX=/usr and install the binutils port, and get the desired result.

Regards,
--
-Chuck

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to