On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Linda Messerschmidt < linda.messerschm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:48 PM, John Almberg <jalmb...@identry.com> > wrote: > > As a sanity check... I've been studying these processes all morning. When > I > > use 'top', the column RES shows the amount of RAM used for the process, > > correct? This is the value I'd like to get down. > > How many Apache processes are involved, total? Because I'm really not > sure how much success you're going to have with this. You're at 22mb > already (by comparison mine are 44mb *without* mod_php). How much > improvement are you looking for? A couple of megs? > > Unless there are tens of thousands of processes, buying a couple of > gigs of RAM is probably the most time and cost effective solution. > > Also keep in mind that a lot of the RES is the configuration, which > isn't going to change at all when you disable modules. (Unless you > change it.) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > Not to mention the RES column is a horribly inaccurate method of calculating mem usage by application. They don't run 18 MB each that is shared mem. -- Adam Vande More _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
