Manish Jain wrote:
>...Does each child start 'make fetch' in the background ?
make checksum, yes.
>Further, how can portmaster be tuned to automatically ignore ports which
>are actually marked as IGNORE in the port directory ? This is not
>covered in the manpage.
It respects IGNORE (it checks for it in the port Makefile, and also
hands off to bsd.port.mk, which respects it). If you mean +IGNOREME,
the others have answered your question.
>While doing portmaster -a, I have only managed to stop portmaster from
>building exactly one port specified with the -x option. Can I get to
>stop multiple ports from being built ? Is there regular expression
>support for the -x option ?
Not in the sense that you mean, at least that I'm aware of. This one
of the things that needs improvement. It is a bit awkward, because it
uses the shell's built-in POSIX getopts to parse options, and then
calls itself recursively. One way you could fix it would be to apply
a patch like:
--- portmaster.orig 2009-07-01 12:36:14.000000000 -0400
+++ portmaster 2009-07-01 18:55:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
if [ -z "$PARENT_PID" ]; then
PARENT_PID=$$
: ${TMPDIR:=/tmp}
- UPGRADE_TOOL=portmaster
+ UPGRADE_TOOL=$0
# /usr/local is needed in the path for make
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin
@@ -788,7 +788,11 @@
u) UNATTENDED=uopt; ARGS="-u $ARGS" ;;
v) PM_VERBOSE=vopt; ARGS="-v $ARGS" ;;
w) SAVE_SHARED=wopt; ARGS="-w $ARGS" ;;
- x) EXCL=$OPTARG ;;
+ x) if [ -z "${OPTARG%%-*}" ]; then
+ fail 'The -x option requires an argument'
+ else
+ EXCL="-x $OPTARG $EXCL"
+ fi ;;
*) echo '' ; echo "===>>> Try ${0##*/} --help"; exit 1 ;;
esac
done
@@ -810,10 +814,7 @@
[ -n "$FETCH_ONLY" -a -n "$NO_RECURSIVE_CONFIG" ] &&
fail "The -F and -G options are mutually exclusive"
if [ -n "$EXCL" ]; then
- case "$EXCL" in
- -*) fail 'The -x option requires an argument' ;;
- *) ARGS="-x $EXCL $ARGS" ;;
- esac
+ ARGS="$EXCL $ARGS"
fi
#=============== Begin functions for getopts features and main ===============
@@ -1461,14 +1462,17 @@
check_exclude () {
[ -n "$EXCL" ] || return 0
- case "$1" in
- *${EXCL}*)
- if [ -n "$PM_VERBOSE" ]; then
- echo "===>>> Skipping $1"
- echo " because it matches the pattern: *${EXCL}*"
- fi
- return 1 ;;
- esac
+ for pkgglob in `echo "$EXCL" | sed -e 's#-x##g'`
+ do
+ case "$1" in
+ *${pkgglob}*)
+ if [ -n "$PM_VERBOSE" ]; then
+ echo "===>>> Skipping $1"
+ echo " because it matches the pattern:
*${pkgglob}*"
+ fi
+ return 1 ;;
+ esac ;
+ done
return 0
}
(Mind the whitespace because of my MUA.) Then you could just use
repeated -x flags, each with one and only one package glob that you
wanted to exclude. I changed the definition of UPGRADE_TOOL so that
you could put this script in your path under another name, say
"jainpmaster", and then call it independently of the original
portmaster. As usual, I make no claim that this is the best, only, or
most elegant way to do this.
Regards,
b.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
