On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:49:50AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >> I mean things like sending private data to someone else, scanning for > >> other programs i have on disk, my addressbook etc. > > > > Given enough incentive, it unfortunately seems even open source > > developers will resort to sneaky tactics: > > http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/05/mozilla-ponders-policy-change-after-firefox-extension-battle.ars > > but it's at least much more difficult. And - my other rule fits very well > here. Avoid OVERCOMPLEX programs. > > Unfortunately there are no well done WWW browsers for unix in the world. > links -g is an exceptions, but in the same time it's quite limited. > But have best fonts :)
You're right: browser code is overly complex, and a nightmare to audit properly for security purposes. That's why when working in a sensitive environment, I browse the web primarily with elinks (with JavaScript disabled, of course), and secondarily and only when absolutely necessary with the usual firefox+noscript+abp... both browsers running in a virtual box (qemu, virtualbox) dedicated to this purpose and this purpose only. Of course, I'm taking more precautions, as running in a box may still not be 100% secure, if someone creative enough found a way to break out of the guest OS into the host OS; but everything else is just irresponsible and way too risky, from a security point of view. Surely, not everyone has the same security requirements, and YMMV. ;-) -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
