On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 05:44:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > 2009/5/27 Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>: > >> > >> It is NOT an opinion that you were rude in your reply, and it is NOT > >> an opinion that it's not your place to advise on how much constitutes > >> an 'acceptable' or 'sufficient' donation. > >> > >> You were just plain wrong in doing so, and you should either quietly > >> stop replying defending your actions, or even perhaps admit you were > >> wrong and apologise. > >> > > just another funny post - it's not an opinion, it's a fact BECAUSE YOU > > DECIDED SO. > > Why did you (attempt to) answer the question in the first place then?
Maybe he's trolling. Look how successful he was at instigating a flame war. . . . -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Bill McKibben: "The laws of Congress and the laws of physics have grown increasingly divergent, and the laws of physics are not likely to yield."
pgp51FXEmpwTC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
