On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:19:27AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Hello, > Ok so portupgrde did not work in installing the latest KDE. > I cannot get KDE to run at all. > I get errors about libintl being missing. > Plus a mysterious and new requirement to tell make I have a Matrox 450 > card. > Plus the fact I cannot even re-intall KDE from the 4.7 ISO CD's. > I get the highly useful message "Error -1". > > So, in my attempts to portupgrade, I get 0 points. > > Now, correct me if I am wrong. > The tag for ports should always be ".", since the do not follow any kind > of upgrade system like the release does. > Why does portupgrade try to find 4.8-PRELEASE ports ? > This is nonsense. > From where is it getting this idea ? > > I promise,if someone is capable of explaining this to me, I will write a > HOWTO. > > Because the whole frigging thing is just useless. That is my experience.
I've been having much the same experience. Trying to upgrade things let go too long on my 4.7-PRE system has been nearly' futile. I like having src, like most of us hackers. But take Redhat that a friend installed on another system. It sucks over ports and plugs them in and adjusts the dependencies and the newer Linux programs Just-Work. I tried to get the FBSD vers of mozilla working (with plugins) for a month. It wasn't until I installed "linux-mozilla" that everythng worked here. Flash, shockwave, real-audio... Flames to /dev/null, gentlemen. I know that RH is commercial. Still, wouldn't it be "allowable" to check out their ports system?? gary > -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message