Adam Vandemore wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: >> >>> Tim Judd writes: >>> >>> >>>> I don't understand the "months/years" or "weeks/days" symptom of OOo. >>>> >>>> On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU >>>> 6600 @ >>>> 2.40GHz >>>> >>>> Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize only 1 CPU... my >>>> top always said <=50% CPU usage >>>> >>> For comparison: on a P4/2.26ghz/2 gbyte RAM, lightly loaded >>> with fairly fast SCSI disks, it takes 30+ hours. >>> >>> >>> Robert Huff >>> >> >> Sorry if this is getting old.... . >> >> I'm running two desktops, one 2.8GHz, this one 2.4. Both with >> "only" 1G ram. I useemy hardware pretty intensively, not lightly >> loaded, and building a full-blown OO takes at least three days. >> ---This is when I've got plenty of space. With fewer than 5G >> disk, forget it. That's why I want my next computer to be not >> only powerful but with diskspace to burn. >> >> >> >> > just got done compiling ooo3 devel on 1.4 gz pentium-m. I think it > took less than a day, 512 ram, nothing else running. >
My tinderbox machine (see ports-mgmt/tinderbox and http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/README.html) builds this in 8 hours (assuming the distfiles are already available locally). It is a modest 2.5Ghz P4 with 2G RAM and plenty of disk space. I am also using ccache. I would be glad to make these packages available somewhere (this machine is constantly building packages anyway), but I don't have this kind of space available anywhere. If people care enough though, I could probably create a torrent. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
