On Wednesday 25 February 2009 12:35:23 pm Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote: > Hi > I have two PCI NICs and one builtin NIC on freebsd 7.0 > ifconfig shows information somthing like: > > bge0: flags=8843<UP, broadcast, runing, simplex, multicast>metric 0 mtu > 1500 options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM, VLAN_HWTAGGING. VLAN_HWCSUM> > ether 00:13:21:f8:7e:56 > inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier
This is NIC doesn't appear to be plugged in. > sk0: flags=8843<UP, broadcast, runing, simplex, multicast>metric 0 mtu > 1500 options=b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM, VLAN_MTU> > ether 00:0a:5e:1a:69:25 > inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier Neither is this one. > Note: bge0 is builtin NIC > sk0 is 3com PCI NIC > > now after configuration of IPV4 Addresses, when i verify the > configuration with ping > > if i ping bge0(ping 192.168.0.1) i get the response of success > but when i ping sk0 (ping 192.168.0.2) Ping gets stuck and gives no > response, neither it gives success or host unreachable or denied kinda > errors.. Why do you want both interfaces to be configured on the same subnet? > it just hangs over there.. and i can juz see one line of ping > not proceeding anyway. and if I terminate it via CTRL C then i get > statistics sumthing like 3 packets sent, 0 received and 100% loss... This is probably expected behavior. What does "netstat -rn" show? My guess is that the route for 192.168.0.0/24 is "link#1" aka bge0 and since it's not plugged in to anything that's as far as it gets. > I am stuck and my brain does not work any more here.. > Can anybody help me ... JN _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
