On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:50:41 -0700 Chad Perrin <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] >I can see both sides of this argument. Maybe we need to split up >FreeBSD documentation into two domains, similarly to the way FreeBSD >software is split into two domains (core and ports) -- and thus have a >place outside the FreeBSD handbook for the same, >more-than-professional quality of documentation, but covering things >we wouldn't be comfortable putting in the FreeBSD Handbook itself. Specifically, what is it we are uncomfortable putting in the handbook? More importantly, what good is a handbook if it is not complete? Would the documentation be cross indexed so a user could find more details on a particular subject? Personally, while perfectly plausible, it sounds like more work than it is worth. -- Jerry [email protected] Memory fault - where am I?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
