prad wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:54:19 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar <[email protected]> wrote:in my practice rejecting part of customers (those who are really "idiots") make sense. you get say 20% less money for 10 times less work.exactly! proper advocacy on a 'free' (or otherwise) system doesn't meanaccommodating ridiculous demands. there needs to be a certain level of sincerity on part of the customers.only the right customers are always right.
Heh. "The customer is /always/ right, even when they're wrong." The
difference is that you give the idiot customers exactly what they ask
for, and the good customers what they actually need....
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
