Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
(I'm not subscribed to freebsd-questions, so please CC me on replies.
I'm also not sure how I ended up getting this mail in the first place;
it looks like someone BCC'd my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address).
Yes, I BCC'd you since you are maintaining a page on the wiki
documenting SATA DMA problems.
Furthermore, one of the most common reports on the FreeBSD lists is the
exact opposite -- users complaining that "their disks are SATA300 but
only operate at SATA150" (caused by that jumper). Users are told to
remove the jumper, and are reminded that the reason the jumper is
enabled by default is said chipset incompatibilities.
That said, your mail confuses me for one reason:
Were you receiving DMA errors with the jumper REMOVED (e.g. SATA300
operation), or with the jumper ENABLED (SATA150 operation)? Your below
description does not state what exactly you did with the jumper to make
your drives work reliably, only "that the jumper capability on your
disks was available".
I should have been more clear.
My disks came with no cap on the SATA150 jumper, although FreeBSD
reported that they were in SATA150 mode. The system would be unusable
from READ_DMA timeouts if the system was ever powered off and brought
back up. I had to do some voodoo of booting in single user mode with
ACPI turned off to repair filesystems and rebuild my gmirror, then load
ACPI and drop back into multi-user mode. I even had to do this if the
system was powered off gracefully. So far, since I capped the jumpers
this has not been the case. I still get them periodically if I do
something like rebuild a gmirror component, so I can no longer say my
problem is completely resolved.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
