Hi! Seems that the CanoScan LiDe 90 is one of the scanners built by Canon that are not supported well. That's a reason to avoid them. :-) I had similar issues with a LiDE 45 (I think it was), and I did soon replace it with a SCSI scanner that worked out of the box without problems.
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:40:54 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb: > > I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane > > (CanoScan LiDe 90). Mayve the SANE team will get this scanner to work later on. But at this point in time, the scanner will be outdated. :-) > In the meantime I have played around a little bit: > I put vendor and product id's into > /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/uscanner.c and usbdevs and rebuilt > my kernel. > So now I get > # dmesg | grep uscanner > uscanner0: <Canon CanoScan, class 255/255, rev 2.00/3.07, > addr 2> on uhub1 > which changes: > # sane-find-scanner -q > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x1900) at > /dev/uscanner0 > Also I tried an appropriate entry in > /usr/local/etc/sane/genesys.conf > but the result of > # scanimage -L > remains the same (not identified) and > # scanimage -d genesys:/dev/uscanner0 > image.pnm > scanimage: open of device genesys:/dev/uscanner0 failed: > Invalid argument This indicates that this scanner works differently than those usually supported by the genesys backend. I "love" Canon for making things complicated exactly this way. Maybe this scanner is compatible to another driver, but that's only a guess. Maybe it's not compatible to anything that exists. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
