RW wrote: > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:16:08 -0800 > Peter Giessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> And Safari is based on KDE's Konquerer (which already runs on >> FreeBSD), so with a FreeBSD version of Chrome, you would essentially >> have Konquerer ported to Apple, ported to Microsoft, ported to Linux, >> ported back to FreeBSD.... > > They've based their rendering on WebKit, but there's a lot more to > Chrome than that: > > http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/ > > I think it looks very interesting.
I think it would be in beta for decades :) There's just so much thing they said they'll do that would be very complicated to implement - their multiprocessing model instead of multithreading for example. To me it looks like they will soon find out that there's a reason todays browsers behave like they to - the platform (HTML, CSS, JS, Flash...) is very complex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
