at FAT.
possibly untrue in Win NT,
From what I've read, it's a journalling filesytem based on a
i mean FAT partition under NT.
I see that ext4 the successor to ext3, and which also has extent
support, has a defragmenter. And it appears to give significant
increases in read speeds.
still it's something wrong if it needs the defragmenter at all...
UFS do not.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
