Wojciech Puchar wrote:
(look at how long it took the
BSDs to have native file-level ACLs).
because in unix they are not actually needed.
users&groups system is just perfect.
That's one man's opinion.
i don't know anyone here that actually use ACL under unix
because he/she needs it.
It depends on your definition of "need", I guess. The groups file could
always be the power set[1] of the passwd file.
Svein Halvor
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_set
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
