On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:49 +0300
Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's certainly possible. The OpenBSD team did this when they split off
> NetBSD. The Dragonfly BSD folks have done it already when they branched
> from FreeBSD 4.X. So you can definitely do it. But you should probably
> understand a lot about the way the system works before doing that, and
> changing just the "uname" output is not enough.
there is also the other side of the coin, that of user-land apps that parse the
output of uname to handle things in different ways. It may not be the best way
to do things , but it's done quite a bit. Of course, this is be irrelevant if
you plan to have a completely locked up OS ....
And there is also all the other software that is bundled in base, openssh, comes
to mind:
$ nc -v localhost 22
Connection to localhost 22 port [tcp/ssh] succeeded!
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.5p1 FreeBSD-20061110
....
and man pages, and doc,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Two things have come out of Berkeley, Unix and LSD.
It is uncertain which caused the other.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"