On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:57:08 -0400
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to "Ian Lord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I have to install a linux machine and don't know which distribution to
> > take.
>
> I highly recommend CentOS for the following reasons:
> 1) It's free.
> 2) It's kept up to date.
> 3) It's 100% Red Hat compatible, which means:
> a) 99% of the howtos on the internet will work
> b) 99% of the Linux packages you find will work
> c) You can lie to vendors and tell them you're running Red Hat to get
> support.
+1
> As for the packages thing: 300 seems to be about the minimum # of
> packages to make a working Linux install. Keep in mind that
> _everything_ is a package in Linux, even the kernel, so just installing
> typical stuff like ls and ps and top adds packages to the system.
yup
> The CentOS installer does have an option for an X-less install.
yup
> The Red Hat mentality doesn't go much for rolling your own packages,
> so you might not like CentOS for that reason, but it's a compromise.
actually, i've been rolling my own rpms from srpms and it IS quite simple.
> They have a # of upgrade managers similar to portupgrade, such as
> up2date and yum.
yum is 100 times better than up2date (except that u can't run 2 instances of
yum @ the same time...but it's just a minor annoyance)
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"And that's one reason we like to believe in genius. It gives us an excuse for
being lazy." Paul Graham
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
