>> You may be able to increase the -r and -w sizes to improve >> things. > > Yes, well I already tried that but it didn't work (it was even > worse !) > >> My understanding is: you should use UDP mounts if the servers >> are close together (i.e., one hub/switch between them, low >> latency) but use TCP mounts if they are far apart (i.e. many >> hops, high latency, lots of dropped packets).I don't know if >> specifying both -u and -t hurts anything. > > Well, the clients are configured to mount NFS with UDP. > This is what I have in my nfs client fstab. I came up with these numbers in an attempt to get client NFS access speeds up to par with SMB or CIFS connections:
nfsserver:/data /data nfs fsv3,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768,rw On the NFS server I have in my /etc/sysctl.conf: vfs.nfs.async=1 Also make sure you have enough nfsiod running on the client to service requests, and enough nfsd on the server to service the clients. YMMV, Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
