So my problem is that things are expecting libs in /usr/compat/linux/lib instead of /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib, and when they don't find it in linux/lib they go straight to the FreeBSD version?
So should I be fixing my path, or linking linux/usr/lib to linux/lib, or what? Steve On Feb 11, 2008 12:06 PM, Reid Linnemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Written by Michael Ross on 02/11/08 12:42>> > > > Am 11.02.2008, 19:26 Uhr, schrieb Reid Linnemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >> It is not finding the FreeBSD versions of libraries. There is no > >> /usr/lib/librt.so.1 in FreeBSD, that is linux's real-time threading > >> library. Try brandelf /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/librt.so.1 to see if > >> it's branded. > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ brandelf /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/librt.so.1 > > brandelf: error opening file /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/librt.so.1: No > > such file or directory > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ brandelf /usr/compat/linux/lib/librt.so.1 > > File '/usr/compat/linux/lib/librt.so.1' is of brand 'SVR4' (0). > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ brandelf /usr/lib/librt.so.1 > > File '/usr/lib/librt.so.1' is of brand 'FreeBSD' (9). > > > > > > Michael > > Okay, I need to proofread. /usr/compat/linux/lib/librt.so.1 is the right > path. I've never seen a librt in FreeBSD, but I guess I'm wrong. I've > dug a little deeper and seen other people work around this by linking > /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/librt.so.1 to the actual lib at > > /usr/compat/linux/lib/librt.so.1 > -- Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
