"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2, > when gpg is still in the tree? > > I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2 > installed.
security/gnupg is gpg2, and has been for about a year. gpg1 is now a separate port, and you need to make separate arrangements if you want to start using security/gnupg1 instead of security/gnupg. portupgrade has a "-o" option for this purpose. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
