On 9/25/07, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:44:33 +0300 > > From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On 9/25/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Monday 24 September 2007 22:47:59 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > > > > > Could you please put it somewhere where so that I could fetch it? > > > > > > Probably the safest way: > > > pkg_add -r gcc-4.2.2_20070905.tbz > > > > > > Then set CC and CXX in /etc/make.conf to point to the installed gcc > > > in /usr/local. This should get you through the build-tools stage. If it > > > creates issues later on, you should have a libgcc_* in /usr/obj. In fact, > > > I > > > highly recommend pressing ctrl-c after gcc has been built and copy the > > > missing library from /usr/obj to /usr/lib then unset CC and CXX > > > in /etc/make.conf and re-run buildworld. > > > > > > I just looked on freebsd ftp servers, there's a package for amd64 arch and > > > 7-current dated Sep 15. > > > -- > > > Mel > > > > Hello, > > > > I installed that. > > > > And it did the trick. > > > > I just don't want to take the risk now. > > > > I did these steps > > > > rm -r /usr/obj/* > > cd /usr/src > > make cleandir > > make cleanworld > > make -j7 buildworld > > > > I'm too worried, I may get broken world now. > > > > Shall I recopy libgcc_* from /obj again and rebuild the world again? > > since current libgcc_* is made by the gcc42 latest port. > > If you use gcc 4.2.2 to buildworld, it does a two stage build. It starts > by building the base gcc (4.2.1) withe the default compiler and then > builds it again using the just built compiler. You should be fine if you > define CC as gcc422. It will only be used to build the gcc4.2.1 > compiler. Once that is done, the make system will use only the newly > built version. > > If you have removed /usr/obj/*, you can speed the build with -DNO_CLEAN. > (There is nothing to clean, but make will still try.) Since there is > nothing to clean, making cleandir and cleanworld looks unnecessary, > too. > > Unless you have a 6 core system, -j7 is probably excessive. Both my own > tests and those of others show that having one more build thread than > there are processors seems to be the sweet spot. (I don't recall if > anyone has tested at over 6 cores, though.) > > I think I understand the build system, but I am far from a make(1) guru, > so. if I misunderstand any of it, hopefully those who are will chime in > with the right information. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Thanks I fixed by coping it from obj -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
