On 23 Sep 2007, at 11:22, cpghost wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:30:59 +0300
"Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/22/07, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i personally use only sendmail.
Yep... if it works, don't 'fix' it.
same with any other things :)
I would prefer to have postfix vs sendmail since it built with
security in mind
Ditto here. I've switched to postfix after a talk by
Wietse Venema at the SANE 1998:
http://www.sane.nl/events/sane98/daily/19/venema.html
(postfix was still named VMailer back then)
and never looked back since. I was lucky doing so, because
soon after, there had been a flurry of sendmail exploits,
while postfix kept chugging along undisturbed. But more
importantly, its behaviour under stress and huge traffic
bursts is excellent.
I have a russian friend, he's a sysadmin, works exclusively with
FreeBSD. He reckon Postfix is also great under pressure. Since
sendmail is in the core of FreeBSD, does that mean it will quickly
get security updates when exploits are found?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
