On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:11:06 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a "perfectly acceptable alternative for home desktop users who have > > previously known only Windows." It's not, and it never will be. > > never say never, but i wish too it will never be. Please note that the original posting contains a hidden claim that window$ is a perfect, eternal and god-given desktop system. Therefore if you say that FreeBSD will never be a "perfectly acceptable alternative..." to that, you agree with that hidden claim. window$ as a desktop system is as wrong as it is as an "operating system". In my opinion, FreeBSD set up as a desktop system is what a desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_ -- or can be if you want -- a "perfect desktop system". Or: "perfect desktop system" has nothing to do with m$'s approach. To Latitude: if you can't accept this ^^^, then don't switch. Nikola Lečić _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
