On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:35:25 +0000 Alex Zbyslaw writes: > Bram Schoenmakers wrote: > > >Op vrijdag 16 maart 2007, schreef Alex Zbyslaw: > > > > > >>Can you try explicitly putting a "-h 0" into your incremental command > >>line and see if that makes a difference? > >> > >> > > > >I've done that and now dump behaves like it should. I don't understand why, > >because the man page says that -h 1 is default (and shouldn't be supplied > >then). But with -h 0 on every incremental dump it's OK now.
My reading of the man doesn't suggest that -h "shouldn't be supplied then", ie that -h 1 is only the default *iff* you supply -h at all, not that -h 1 is default if you don't mention -h .. but I could be mistaken! > I can only think of two possibilities: > > 1) There is a bug in whatever version of FreeBSD you are running and > -h 1 is somehow *not* the default. 6.2 Release? > > 2) There is some kind of bug with your command line, but without > seeing it, I can't tell. > > Glad you got the problem worked around; when I finally get around to > 6.2 I will be curious to see if I can replicate the problem. Or perhaps it only requires clarification / better phrasing in the man? Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
