On Monday 21 August 2006 15:02, Garrett Cooper wrote: > CVSUP isn't that difficult IMHO to learn, and is a better, more > efficient way to download the ports Makefiles. It will take him all of > 10-20 minutes to configure if he reads the documentation and uses the > example file.
I am always willing to learn something new. How is it more efficient at
downloading the port's Makefiles? I agree that the first time you
run 'portsnap' it might take twenty minutes to fetch and extract the files.
However, after that it only requires a fetch and update to complete the job.
It appears, to me anyway, to run at least as quick as cvsup plus I do not
have to rebuild the index. If he runs cvsup I believe he has to rebuild the
index, or am I mistaken?
In any case, he has to use one method or the other or he will never get his
system updated.
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every man takes the limits of his own field
of vision for the limits of the world.
Schopenhauer
pgplxJNQYesZ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
