A predilection to evangelize tools that supports ones own belief in software superiority is what curtails our ability to move any platform forward. I would keep a hesitant eye on any individual that holds such fervent beliefs. I have old NT servers that have run Disney.com for several years and have served us well. Technology is an enabler, not a divider. Too many people unknowingly adopt the later.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:31 PM To: Born, Clinton Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? On Jul 27, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Born, Clinton wrote: > Really? I wouldn't want such a myopic view when choosing to > allocate our > shareholders dollars. Best tool for the job. Period! That is not as easy as you make it out to be. WHat one might in the short term see as the best tool may not be such in 2 years when support is dropped and you are in a forced obsolescence and have to replace it with something else... So making value judgments like tools that are known to be well supported on FReeBSD for example is part of determining the best tool for the job Chad > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amitabh Kant > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:28 AM > To: Nikolas Britton > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? > > And this is what I always do. As a person responsible for > recommending/approving/buying harware related stuff for few different > companies, I make it a point that I *prefer* only those brands that > have support for FreeBSD. For me, this is more so in case of RAID > cards. > > On 7/27/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Except most of the people using FreeBSD in a professional setting are >> pretty high up on the IT/IS/MIS food chain. If a product doesn't work >> on my platform of choice then there's no way in hell I'll approve >> it's >> uses on other platforms, FreeBSD is my litmus test. If a vendor >> doesn't support FreeBSD they can still pass my test by providing open >> documentation. >> > > I see the whole issue this way: companies are free to choose whether > to support FreeBSD or not, and I am free to choose/recommend their > product in my installations. It's only when we start to speak with our > money bags, that it will make commercial sense to them to support > *BSD. > > Amitabh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
