On Wednesday 26 July 2006 18:34, Darrin Chandler wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 06:15:48PM +0100, RW wrote: > > KDE is mostly application modules, which you don't need to install if you > > dont want them. These days, though, the avoidance of bloat is mostly just > > a fetish. I've not noticed any speed difference between KDE and the > > lighter window managers for years. And as far as disk space is concerned > > we are talking about pennies. I've tried fluxbox and the like off-and-on, > > but I always miss some KDE feature within minutes. > > I disagree. Bloat is bloat. I'm using ion3 on my laptop and it's > blazingly fast. I installed KDE on my wife's computer and while it's not > a dog it is NOT blazingly fast.
All I can say is I don't see a difference between KDE, XFCE, Fluxbox and TWM on the same machine. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
