> Don't you think you should test it instead of guessing? :-) I suggested > it because it *is* a possibility (that is why I have it in my kernel). yes, but doesn't it make sense to find memory consuming things before adding more? btw. how can we check for such things?
> Are you sure you are using swap backing and not malloc? nope, i'm not sure if it was that, but -M was passed to mdmfs, so malloc(9) was used. we changed the code to swap-based, let's see if that fixes our problem. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
