Kevin Kinsey writes:
> >> It's somewhat interesting (to me) that the even numbered releases
> >> seem to have had longer and perhaps more successful runs than the
> >> odd numbered ones. 5.X, in particular, seemed short to me.
>
> > Two comments:
> > 1) Sample size = 2.
>
> You may need to explain the math for that. 6 code trees, divided
> by either the number of odds or evens, equals 3.
I'm discarding 1.x as affected by outside events (the lawsuit)
and 6.x, as both a) uncompleted and b) done under a different formal
release structure.
That leaves [2-5] - 4 units, or two pairs for comparison.
Robert Huff
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
