At 06:17 AM 3/29/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:35 am, Glenn Dawson wrote:
= I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only
= problem was with getting the reject message to work properly.
=
= Anyway...
=
= This is what I typically do:
=
= [EMAIL PROTECTED]           localaccount1
= [EMAIL PROTECTED]           localaccount2
= @bar.com              error:nouser 550 No such user here

Glenn, this is exactly what I have according to my initial posting
in this thread.

Exactly, which is why I didn't think there was a problem with most of it, as re-stated above, and now again, here.

I took the example from sendmail's cf/README:

= Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable:
=
=       [EMAIL PROTECTED]  foo
=       [EMAIL PROTECTED]    bar
=       @example.com      error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks

Unfortunately, as I write in that initial posting, although it does have
some effect, it does not seem sufficient:

= I can see the "No spam,thanks" messages logged in the maillog
= (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is
= no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other
= software)

What does "other software" refer to in this case?

and some of these messages seem to pass through
= (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses).
=
= For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam
= message generates:
=
= Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... No spam,thanks = Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx]
=
= Despite the "No spam,thanks" the message was accepted.

I don't see anything in the log entries above to indicate that the message was accepted at all. What makes you think that it was?

On a general note, you may want to include the delay_checks feature. That will allow sendmail to get most of the info about a message before seeing if it should be rejected or not. If nothing else it allows you to have more meaningful log info on rejected mail.

-Glenn

=
= What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

Yours,

        -mi
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to