I like this idea. It's not fun when you try to update your system, then have to spend time fixing things.
On 3/15/06, Jason C. Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:24:08PM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote: > >> Is there a "stable" ports tree? > > > > No. > > However you can sup the ports tree for a specific release. I run ports > using "tag=RELEASE_6_0_0". The reason I do this is that I find it to be > much less work. > > I am a much more conservative user than many. I really hate chasing > down down upgrade dependencies even with the the very nice ports tools > we have today. > > If you really wanted a particular port to be updgraded, you can fetch > just that one port and build it. This would give you a manually > controlled psuedo-stable. It would be more work though. > > Later, > Jason C. Wells > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
