Erik Trulsson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:18:13AM -0400, Duane Whitty wrote: >> Mike Loiterman wrote: >>> This is my supfile: >>> >>> *default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org >>> *default base=/usr >>> *default prefix=/usr >>> *default release=cvs >>> *default tag=RELENG_6_0 >>> *default delete use-rel-suffix >>> >>> src-all >>> >>> *default tag=. >>> ports-all >>> doc-all >>> >>> I have been using it like this for years, obviously changing to the >>> latest release tag. I haven't had problem and I'm not having >>> problems, but my question is this: >>> >>> Is it advisable to sync my source to RELEASE, but to CURRENT for >>> ports? Typically, I upgade my ports a few days after they get >>> updated so I'm always running the latest version, but would it be >>> better to sync both ports and source to RELEASE? >>> >> Hi Mike, >> >> It would be nice I guess if ports were tagged like src but they are >> not. Basically HEAD is all there is vis-a-vis tags. You can specify >> a specific date however. > > Ports *are* tagged for each release, but they are not branched.
Yes, I know, which is why I asked the question...which is better? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
