At 22:08 04.03.2006, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 05:45:29PM +0100, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
> At 12:05 03.03.2006, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:58:37AM +0100, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
> > > I run the script to save time.
> > > Basically I'd run the exact same chain of commands otherwise.
> >
> > You're missing the point: you'd run the exact same chain of commands
> >
> > --> _if everything goes according to plan_ <--
> >
> > What this list has been telling you is that it sometimes doesn't work
> > like anyone expects to, and you need to make an informed decision about
> > the next command to enter instead of having the script proceed.
>
> Whether I have my commands in my script or in my head doesn't
> make any difference. Yes I do read UPDATING and if I notice any
> changes they will be applied respectively.
Err...
Did you even read what I wrote?
The moment one step does NOT work in the command sequence, you need to
alter your next move. No script can be prepared for all the things
that can happen. Which is why everyone is recommending you NOT to run
things in a script.
Also, please keep the mailing list in the loop, to help other people
asking the same question.
--Stijn
--
If today is the first day of the rest of your life, what the hell was
yesterday?
I understand what you mean.
What I'm saying is, I do not expect a script to be prepared.
I am the one reading UPDATING and modifying the script if there is a change.
Manually. Whether I write the sequence in the command line or into
a script that I execute doesn't make no difference!
What do you mean, mailing list in the loop?
I need to write another mail for this thread now, but I should reply
to the proper
mail so I don't confuse you guys up.
Hartelijk dank, Stijn!
Vaaf
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
