Nikolas Britton wrote:
Please can you be careful when you attribute your comments. You've sent
this email "to" me, and left only my name in the attributions as if I
were someone suggesting either dd or diskinfo as accurate benchmarks,
when in fact my contribution was to suggest unixbench and sandra-lite.
Maybe you hate those too, in which case you can quote what I said
in-context and rubbish that at your pleasure.
Yes I see your point, it does look like I'm replying to something you
wrote. This was a oversight and I am sorry.
OK.
Remember that 105MB/s number I quoted above?, that's just the
sustained read transfer rate for a big ass file, I don't need to work
with big ass files. I need to work with 15MB files (+/- 5MB). After
buying the right disks, controller, mainboard etc. and lots of tuning
with the help of iozone I get: 200 - 350MB/s overall (read, write,
etc.) for files less then or equal to 64MB*.
So anyways, that's what iozone can do for you. google it and you'll
find out more stuff about it.
Thanks for the info. I think I can only dream about numbers like like
yours. Iozone looks to be in the ports so I see some of my weekend
disappearing looking at it :-)
Best,
--Alex
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
