On 2006-02-14 07:47, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Kevin Kinsey wrote: >>Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>> Bah! That's too slow for my taste. I would usually go for a newfs, >>> dump, and restore option. For instance, to create a copy of /usr on a >>> second disk: >>> >>> newfs -U /dev/ad1s1a >>> mount /dev/ad1s1a /mnt >>> dump -0 -a -L /usr | ( cd /mnt ; restore ruvf - ) >>> >>> Copying with dd(1) is not as fast :) >> >> Sorry to butt in --- but I'm needing to start cloning too. Looks >> like a winner to me ... wouldn't this have the added advantage >> of making "same size and geometry" (cf. Erik Trulsson, 4 hours ago, >> this thread) less relevant? >> >> As long as the "new" slice had enough space, geometry shouldn't >> matter to dump|restore .... <?> > > Just for the archives: > > Giorgios' solution is very nice, but needs the "-f" option and another > "-" to work properly AFAICT, both from experience and from reading > dump(8): > > dump -0 -a -L -f - /usr | (cd /mnt ; restore ruvf - ) > > If you don't include "-f" (for "file") and "-" (for "stdout"), then your > command will fail with: > > DUMP: Cannot open output "/dev/sa0"
Oops! Yes, good catch :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
