On 29/01/06, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 28 January 2006 19:19, Chris wrote: > > > > Concerning speed I discovered the version in the ports tree is very > > slow, I have portsnap running zippy when using fetch on 2 5.4 boxes > > which I use the version in the base system, on 2 5.3 boxes and a 4.10 > > box I use the version from ports and portsnap fetch takes about 20-30 > > minutes to fetch 2000 port patches, which takes a few seconds on the > > base version, I discovered the base version doesnt fetch from a url > > but instead of a new server. I contacted the dev and he confirmed > > the ports version is old so I guess the ports maintainer needs to > > update it until that is done I dont reccomend it for 5.3 and older. > > > > Chris > > Hi Chris, > > I run two 6.0 stable boxes at home. I guess that's why one needs to ask > what version of FreeBSD are you using? I'd never used portsnap until I > was trying to put as much speed as I could into setting up the two 6.0 > boxes. I will remeber about 5.3 and older. > > Don >
As previously mentioned on the 5 boxes, 2 run 5.3 2 run 5.4 1 runs 4.10 as portsnap is included in the base on 5.4 I just used that and it is very fast, on 5.3 and 4.10 I installed from ports and is very slow but this is because it uses an older method to fetch the patches I am told. I will try the -x next time I update. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
