On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Mathias Menzel-Nielsen wrote: > My hardware is fully supported by FreeBSD and in fact some of it was > supported earlier on FreeBSD than on Linux. > For example, the Brooktree bktr(4) Video-Capture driver existed first on > FreeBSD, also high-speed cd-burning was > not possible on Linux without eating all available cpu-time, before > kernel 2.6 -- at that time FreeBSD burned my cd's > at 52x-speed without noticeable cpu-usage. Multimedia was always a > glance on FreeBSD -- dvd-playback/record, > xvid-encoding, tv-capturing, blender -- all ever worked like a champ. > Additionally to that, i would never move back to a linux distro, simply > because their archaic package-management > is not half as reliable in day-to-day-use as the FreeBSD ports tree. I > am running the same FreeBSD install since 4.9 > and it was easy and non-problematic to update to even major release > changes. Even if that criticism doesnt apply > as much to gentoo, which has some good efforts to use a "ports-tree" > under Linux, I just prefer the original :)
Same here. Using FreeBSD as a multimedia workstation and very happy with it. There are still a few shortcomings though, like missing MIDI recording (not playback) functionality and no support for my Pinnacle DC10+ Zoran video capture card; but if I need that, I'd just dual-boot into gentoo (which *does* feel a lot like FreeBSD from an admin POV and the main reason I picked that distro, just to feel more at home), do whatever is needed, and then reboot into FreeBSD. Not ideal, but workable. Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
